Romantic Voices
On Saturday last Anthony Padilla dazzled everyone present with blazing technique and melting sensitivity in the music of the two arch-Romantic composers, Franz Liszt and Sergei Rachmaninov. In a career of many dimensions including rock-star level celebrity, Liszt defined what was possible on the modern piano almost before the piano itself was capable of doing all those things. Because Liszt wrote so much for his own–later regretted–ostentatious career as the world’s greatest pianist, he wrote a good deal of vacuous music. Properly, Tony included some of it on his program. So we had original Liszt and we had Liszt’s takes on the music of other romantics such as Bach, Schubert, and Schumann. The Rachmaninov came in the form of his very late set of variations on La folia, a popular tune run into the ground by so many other composers and attributed in error to Corelli, hence the title Variations on a Theme of Corelli.
Among so much that was remarkable about the evening–and has been about our “Classically Romantic” series–is the genuineness of the musical voices we have heard. On the recommendation of a friend I once tried to listen to variations on La folia by Antonio Salieri (yes, that Salieri of Amadeus infamy). I was driving a colleague to the airport and popped the CD into the player in the car. We lasted maybe seven or eight variations, and then to my relief, Craig pushed the eject button in self-defense. That would not have happened had we been listening to Rachmaninov or, for that matter, even Liszt at his most meretricious.
So what’s the difference? At least in part, I think the difference is that we hear the unique voice of the composer. Could anyone other than Rachmaninov have written those Corelli variations? Only a clever imitator. One criterion of a major artist is that they have found their voice and that voice resonates with people even centuries later. There have been many more terrific technicians in the arts than great creators.
Along with hundreds of contemporaries, Salieri was an accomplished and successful composer, but he is pretty much a bore because, lacking a compelling voice, his music sounds derivative of an era rather than a personal statement that commands attention. Like Mozart to Salieri, Liszt had his rivals. Their names are lost to most audiences today because they sounded more like their era than like themselves. Anybody for some Thalberg?
Next up: The music of Schumann, Brahms, and Prokofiev on April 15 with violinist, Maria Larionoff, and pianist, Robin McCabe.
Brooke Creswell